Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics ; (12): 534-540, 2023.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-981990

ABSTRACT

Currently, the main strategy for preventing neonatal group B Streptococcus (GBS) infection is prenatal screening combined with intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis, which has effectively reduced the incidence of neonatal GBS early-onset disease. However, the burden of GBS infection is still significant. The intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis strategy has limitations such as inducing antibiotic resistance and inability to effectively prevent GBS late-onset disease. It is crucial to develop and evaluate other prevention strategies, while paying close attention to assessing penicillin allergy in pregnant women and how to prevent GBS infection in neonates with negative maternal GBS screening. In recent years, there has been some progress in GBS vaccines and related immunological research, and the use of specific vaccines is expected to significantly reduce GBS infection in neonates.


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/prevention & control , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Streptococcal Infections/drug therapy , Streptococcus agalactiae
2.
Clinical Medicine of China ; (12): 38-43, 2023.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-992461

ABSTRACT

Objective:To investigate the effect of the colonization of group B streptococcus (GBS) in pregnant women and the use of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) on perinatal outcomes.Methods:The clinical data of 1 078 pregnant women and their newborn babies delivered in Tongzhou and Xicheng hospital areas of Beijing Friendship Hospital from January 2020 to February 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. The clinical characteristics, complications, perinatal outcomes and neonatal prognosis of the pregnant women with positive and negative GBS were compared according to the GBS colonization, and the effects of IAP on the clinical characteristics, complications, perinatal outcomes and neonatal prognosis of the pregnant women with positive GBS was compared. The measurement data with normal distribution is expressed by x±s, two independent sample t-test was used for comparison between groups. Counting data were expressed in cases or cases (%), Inter group comparison χ 2 test. Results:Among 1 078 pregnant women, 93 were GBS positive (8.6%, GBS positive group), and 93 cases matching the clinical data of the GBS positive group were selected as the GBS negative group. There was no significant difference in age, gestational age, number of pregnancies, number of births, mode of delivery, abnormal blood pressure, abnormal blood glucose, abnormal thyroid function and the proportion of any complication in the GBS positive group (P values were 0.630, 0.613, 0.311, 0.761, 0.163, 0.601, 0.467, 0.388, 1.000, respectively). The proportion of neonates in GBS positive group transferred to pediatrics, the incidence of neonatal infection, pneumonia, anemia and bacterial infection rate were higher than those in GBS negative group (57.0%(53/93) vs 23.7%(22/93), 10.8%(10/93) vs 3.2%(3/93), 29.0%(27/93) vs 14.0%(13/93), 21.5%(20/93) vs 8.6%(8/93), 22.6%(21/93) vs 6.5%(6/93)) (χ 2 values were 21.47, 4.05, 6.24, 6.05, 9.75, respectively; the P values were <0.001, 0.044, 0.012, 0.014, 0.002, respectively). The hospitalization time of neonates transferred to pediatrics was longer than that of GBS negative group (4(0,5) d vs 0(0,0) d, Z=-4.03, P<0.001). The proportion of neonates in IAP group transferred to pediatrics and the incidence of pathological jaundice and adverse outcomes were lower than those in non IAP group (51.1% (24/47) vs 78.1% (25/32), 44.7% (21/47) vs 78.1% (25/32), 42.6% (20/47) vs 65.6% (21/32)) (χ 2 values are 5.92, 8.76 and 4.06, respectively, P values are 0.015, 0.003 and 0.044 respectively). The hospitalization time of neonates transferred to pediatrics was shorter than that of non IAP group (3(0,5) d vs 5(2,7) d, Z=-2.60, P=0.009). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of delivery mode, water breaking time, birth weight of neonates, infection, pneumonia, bacteremia/sepsis, and anemia ( P values were 0.073, 0.085, 0.479, 0.538, 0.157, 0.161, 0.238). Conclusions:GBS colonization in the lower genital tract does not increase the incidence of intrauterine infection, premature rupture of membranes and spontaneous preterm delivery in pregnant women, but the risk of bacterial infection and adverse outcomes in newborns is higher, the rate of paediatric transfer is higher, and the hospital stay is longer. IAP can reduce the incidence of neonatal pathological jaundice and shorten the hospital stay.

3.
Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics ; (12): 49-53, 2022.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-928565

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES@#To study the effect of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) of group B streptococcus (GBS) infection on the incidence and bacteriological profile of early-onset neonatal sepsis (EONS).@*METHODS@#A retrospective analysis was performed on the medical data of 494 pregnant women with positive GBS screening results and 526 neonates born by these women. According to whether the pregnant woman received IAP, the neonates were divided into two groups: IAP (n=304) and control (n=222). The two groups were compared in terms of clinical indices, incidence rate of EONS, and distribution of pathogenic bacteria in blood culture.@*RESULTS@#Compared with the control group, the IAP group had a significantly lower proportion of children with abnormal clinical manifestations (P<0.001) and a significantly lower incidence rate of EONS (P=0.022). In the IAP group, Escherichia coli (2.3%) was the most common type of pathogenic bacteria in blood culture of the neonates with EONS, while GBS (3.2%) was the most common type of pathogenic bacteria in the control group. The IAP group had a significantly higher detection rate of ampicillin-resistant Escherichia coli than the control group (P=0.029).@*CONCLUSIONS@#Although IAP can significantly reduce the incidence rate of EONS in neonates born to pregnant women with positive GBS screening results, the infection rate of ampicillin-resistant Escherichia coli may increase after IAP treatment. Therefore, it is needed to enhance the monitoring of blood culture results of neonates with EONS and timely adjust treatment plan according to drug susceptibility test results.


Subject(s)
Child , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Incidence , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/prevention & control , Neonatal Sepsis/prevention & control , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Retrospective Studies , Streptococcal Infections/prevention & control , Streptococcus agalactiae
4.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-207073

ABSTRACT

Background: Group B Streptococci (GBS) is an important cause of early onset neonatal sepsis and the maternal colonization of this organism is a key factor in the occurrence of GBS associated morbidity and mortality in the newborns. Timely recognition of its presence in the genital tract of a pregnant women and intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis can significantly bring down the burden of the disease in neonates. A cross sectional study was conducted on  antenatal women during 35-37weeks of gestation to evaluate the prevalence of Group B Streptococci in third trimester of pregnancy and explore the feasibility of including GBS screening in the routine antenatal investigation protocol.Methods: 200 antenatal women satisfying the exclusion/inclusion criteria were recruited for the study. Vaginal and perianal swabs were collected using sterile swab sticks and inoculated using the specified media. Beta hemolysis and typical colonies were looked for under microscope. Positive cases were subjected to intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis and the neonates were observed for 72 hours to look for any signs of sepsis.Results: It was found that 2% of the women screened were positive for GBS .While none of the newborns of the 4 positive cases showed any signs of sepsis.Conclusions: Prophylactic intrapartum prophylaxis against GBS has shown to decrease the chances of neonatal sepsis but more detailed and robust studies are required before incorporating routine screening in our antenatal care system.

6.
Rev. chil. infectol ; 35(4): 424-430, ago. 2018. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-978054

ABSTRACT

Resumen Introducción La infección por Streptococcus agalactiae (β-hemolítico del grupo B (SGB) continúa siendo una de las principales causas de sepsis precoz en países desarrollados a pesar de la implementación de profilaxis efectiva. Objetivos Describir la incidencia, características clínicas y mortalidad de sepsis precoz por SGB en recién nacidos del Centro Hospitalario Pereira Rossell (CHPR), y analizar las fallas de adherencia a las estrategias de prevención. Métodos Estudio retrospectivo de descripción de casos entre los años 2007 a 2015 identificados a partir de la base de datos del laboratorio de bacteriología. Resultados Se identificaron 15 casos de sepsis neonatal precoz a SGB con una incidencia en el período de estudio de 0,23‰. La quimioprofilaxis intraparto no fue realizada en caso alguno. Todos los recién nacidos se presentaron sintomáticos en las primeras 15 h de vida. La dificultad respiratoria fue el signo más frecuente (80%). En un caso se aisló SGB de líquido cefalorraquídeo. La mortalidad fue de 20%. Todas las muertes ocurrieron en las primeras 24 h de vida, siendo dos tercios prematuros. Conclusión La incidencia de sepsis precoz por SGB en el CHPR fue similar a la incidencia en centros donde se realiza quimioprofilaxis. Una mejor adherencia a las estrategias de prevención podría disminuir la incidencia.


Background: Group B Streptococcus (GBS) disease remains the leading cause of early-onset sepsis (EOS) in developed countries despite effective prophylaxis strategies. Aims: To describe the incidence, clinical features and mortality of GBS EOS in infants born at Centro Hospitalario Pereira Rossell (CHPR) and analyse failure of adherence to prevention strategies. Methods: Retrospective review of EOS cases between 2007 and 2015 collected from the bacteriology laboratory database. Results: Fifteen cases of GBS EOS were identified, with an incidence of 0.23% during the study period. Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) was not administered in any of the cases. All infants were symptomatic within the first 15 hours of life, mainly due to respiratory signs (80%). In one case, GBS was isolated from spinal fluid. Mortality rate was 20%. All deaths occurred in the first 24 hours of life, corresponding two thirds to preterm infants. Conclusion: The incidence of GBS EOS at CHPR was similar to other centers where IAP is implemented. Better adherence to prophylaxis strategies could reduce the incidence.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Adolescent , Adult , Young Adult , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/mortality , Streptococcal Infections/mortality , Streptococcal Infections/prevention & control , Sepsis/mortality , Sepsis/prevention & control , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/microbiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Streptococcal Infections/microbiology , Streptococcal Infections/drug therapy , Streptococcus agalactiae/isolation & purification , Retrospective Studies , Sepsis/diagnosis , Sepsis/drug therapy , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/prevention & control , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use
7.
International Journal of Laboratory Medicine ; (12): 1074-1076,1079, 2018.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-692799

ABSTRACT

Objective To analyze the efficiency of perinatal group B streptococcal(GBS)infection preven-tion in the local area.Methods From June 2015 to June 2016,3 667 pregnant women were included.Both pre-natal examinations and deliveries were done in our hospital.The analysis of GBS colonization,risk factors and prevention of early-onset disease were done.Results Among preterm and term pregnant women,the rates of GBS screening were 23.4% and 35.6%,respectively.The positive results of GBS were 10.9% and 8.4%,re-spectively.The percentage of women with 2 risk factors were 22.9% and 0.3%,respectively.GBS screening has a better prediction effect for GBS colonization status of women at labor.There were significant differences in the intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis(IAP)implementation between preterm and term pregnant women. In the IAP efficiency analysis of preterm,GBS colonization and risk factors,preterm had a high sensitivity (96.1%),while the specialties of GBS carry and risk factors were high(93.2% and 90.3% respectively).Con-clusion preterm pregnant women should be highlighted as an important population in the implementation of IAP.GBS screening strategy is better than the risk factors strategy.

8.
International Journal of Laboratory Medicine ; (12): 2852-2853,2856, 2016.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-605415

ABSTRACT

Objective To explore the influence of group B Streptococcus screening during pregnancy and the incidence of the ear‐ly‐onset GBS disease for newborns .Methods Totally 47 cases of pregnant women with premature rupture of membranes (PROM ) , which were GBS positive and accepted antibiotic treatment ,who were chosen as the experimental group .While 73 cases of pregnant women with premature rupture of membranes (PROM) ,which were not accept GBS screening and antibiotic treatment ,were chosen as control group .The neonatal clinical manifestations were observed .The swab specimens were collected from throat and detected of GBS by using PCR method .Results The experimental group showed no occurrence of neonatal group B streptococcal infection , dyspnea ,cyanosis and fever .Totally 7 cases of the control group had group B Streptococcus infection .Totally 2 cases had dyspnea and 2 cases had cyanosis .Totally 4 cases had fever .The neonatal research indicators of these two groups were statistically signifi‐cant differences (P<0 .05) .Conclusion The group B Streptococcus screening during pregnancy would effectively reduce the inci‐dence of neonatal infection of group B Streptococcus .

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL